Difference between revisions of "Talk:Terror"

From Felarya
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
:Is the bio going to be replaced by a new one, or is the character now non-canon? If the latter, the article should probably be deleted, rather than tagged as "under construction". [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 07:12, 15 February 2010 (PST)
 
:Is the bio going to be replaced by a new one, or is the character now non-canon? If the latter, the article should probably be deleted, rather than tagged as "under construction". [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 07:12, 15 February 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
::Replaced, she said.  --[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 22:00, 15 February 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
 +
From Karbo : Yes no problem about that ^^

Latest revision as of 03:20, 16 February 2010

"[16:42:03] Oldman40k2003 : ...normally I don't do such things, but you are saying that you have his permission, and he just hasn't done it himself?

[16:42:14] melancholy-melody13 : yes

[16:42:17] melancholy-melody13 : I have his premission"

That is why I "blanked" the page. I hope I haven't done so incorrectly. ^^;
--Oldman40k2003 16:35, 13 February 2010 (PST)

Is the bio going to be replaced by a new one, or is the character now non-canon? If the latter, the article should probably be deleted, rather than tagged as "under construction". French-snack 07:12, 15 February 2010 (PST)
Replaced, she said. --Oldman40k2003 22:00, 15 February 2010 (PST)


From Karbo : Yes no problem about that ^^