Difference between revisions of "Talk:Succubi"
From Felarya
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form.--[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 20:01, 8 November 2007 (PST) | In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form.--[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 20:01, 8 November 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Woah ! superb job on the rewritting ! Incredible how all flow better. Thank you a lot ;) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:18, 9 November 2007
One interesting note: I don't believe "succubi" is actually the "proper" plural name in English: "succubuses" is. (Just like how the plural of "virus" is "viruses", not "viri") However, inspite of the form "succubi" being improper, it's the most commonly used form by far, and I suspect that "succubi" will become a normal irregular English noun, if it hasn't already happened. (Also just like with "virus" and "viri")
In summary, although "succubi" is probably technically incorrect, it should stay because nobody uses the proper form.--Oldman40k2003 20:01, 8 November 2007 (PST)
Woah ! superb job on the rewritting ! Incredible how all flow better. Thank you a lot ;)
