Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fiona"
From Felarya
French-snack (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:But it just looks messy and inelegant. That empty space is just begging to be tidily filled with a conveniently placed infobox. ;) Plus, it would make the text of the article immediately visible, instead of readers having to scroll down. [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 01:24, 21 January 2010 (PST) | :But it just looks messy and inelegant. That empty space is just begging to be tidily filled with a conveniently placed infobox. ;) Plus, it would make the text of the article immediately visible, instead of readers having to scroll down. [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 01:24, 21 January 2010 (PST) | ||
+ | ::An alternative would be [[User:French-snack/image test|this]] (shifting the ''image'' to the right, to keep the infobox on the left). [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 01:32, 21 January 2010 (PST) | ||
+ | :::Having to scroll down to read the text? Sure, if you have a small monitor. :P I like your idea of moving the picture to the right and I think that is what should be done in this article, and any other articles where there is a conflict. | ||
+ | :::--[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 02:12, 21 January 2010 (PST) | ||
+ | ::::I must have a small monitor, then. :) OK; we'll wait for Karbo's view. But if we're moving images to the right, the other articles involved would be [[Aya]], [[Lucilya]], [[Melany]], [[Subeta]], [[Jade]], [[Belletia]], [[Vivian]], [[Iridan]], and possibly [[Drayla]] and [[Anko]], although the infoboxes there are very small. With [[Masumi]], the picture is too large for it to be convenient. For [[Terror]], the picture is small, so it may not be necessary to move it. [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 04:00, 21 January 2010 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | From Karbo : Mhh not an easy one indeed ^^; In one hand I like the fact that with the image in the right, you don't have to scroll to begin reading, but on the other, I think I prefer the current system because it allow the page to breath more. However I like how you embedded the image description in a box :) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I'm not sure embedding the images is necessary if they're really seperated from the text, but if you'd like me to embed others, it's easy to do. :) [[User:French-snack|French-snack]] 09:40, 21 January 2010 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I don't know about this "page breathing" business. Then again I do tend to prefer high information density layouts.--[[User:Oldman40k2003|Oldman40k2003]] 04:46, 23 January 2010 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 04:46, 23 January 2010
I think the infobox looks better on the right, actually... It's a more logical, tidier use of space. French-snack 02:28, 28 December 2009 (PST)
Mhh though one I think. I agree that it looks tidier but in the same time I think it' better to have a standard format for characters in general ^^
And I am all about the standards. :)
--Oldman40k2003 00:54, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- But it just looks messy and inelegant. That empty space is just begging to be tidily filled with a conveniently placed infobox. ;) Plus, it would make the text of the article immediately visible, instead of readers having to scroll down. French-snack 01:24, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- An alternative would be this (shifting the image to the right, to keep the infobox on the left). French-snack 01:32, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- Having to scroll down to read the text? Sure, if you have a small monitor. :P I like your idea of moving the picture to the right and I think that is what should be done in this article, and any other articles where there is a conflict.
- --Oldman40k2003 02:12, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- I must have a small monitor, then. :) OK; we'll wait for Karbo's view. But if we're moving images to the right, the other articles involved would be Aya, Lucilya, Melany, Subeta, Jade, Belletia, Vivian, Iridan, and possibly Drayla and Anko, although the infoboxes there are very small. With Masumi, the picture is too large for it to be convenient. For Terror, the picture is small, so it may not be necessary to move it. French-snack 04:00, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- An alternative would be this (shifting the image to the right, to keep the infobox on the left). French-snack 01:32, 21 January 2010 (PST)
From Karbo : Mhh not an easy one indeed ^^; In one hand I like the fact that with the image in the right, you don't have to scroll to begin reading, but on the other, I think I prefer the current system because it allow the page to breath more. However I like how you embedded the image description in a box :)
- I'm not sure embedding the images is necessary if they're really seperated from the text, but if you'd like me to embed others, it's easy to do. :) French-snack 09:40, 21 January 2010 (PST)
- I don't know about this "page breathing" business. Then again I do tend to prefer high information density layouts.--Oldman40k2003 04:46, 23 January 2010 (PST)